Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514811›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Theoretical Discussion of Applicability and a Practical Example of Using Statistical Second-Generation Techniques to Analyze Causal Relationships in Animal Experiments.

Becker Katrin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Becker KatrinFaculty of Communication and Business, IST University of Applied Sciences, 40233 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6876-6035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In animal experiments, causal relationships in physiological or disease processes are investigated by using interventions. Applying second-generation statistical methods could be used to identify important links in life processes. This article as a first step describes how second-generation statistical methods that are often used in social sciences are currently applied in veterinary medicine, including a single-animal experimental study, or an ecotoxicity study in fish. It explains how second-generation statistical methods allow flexible modeling to simultaneously calculate causal relationships between constructs in several layers. It continues with a discussion on how theoretical concepts from this statistical approach could be transferred to experimental or medical data. As an applied example, an investigation on a data set analyzed with a second-generation method is presented, showing how this allows us to calculate relationships between variables within a complex theoretical model. Limitations of the use of second-generation statistical methods as strict requirements on the data sets are overcome by technical developments; however, causality cannot be established by statistically testing hypothesized causal structures. Using second-generation statistical methods in the future might promote obtaining more data from one animal and thereby potentially even reducing animals in line with the 3R principle.

Indexed as

3Rpathway modulationRstatistical method

Identifiers

PMID41514811
PMCPMC12784811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.