Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514683›Full record

ArticleCancers2026

Outcomes of pPCL Diagnosed Using the IMWG 2021 Consensus Definition: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.

Priyanka Venkatesh, Razan Mansour, Yara Shatnawi, Akhil Jain, Christopher Strouse, Nausheen Ahmed, Muhammad Umair Mushtaq, Al-Ola Abdallah, Shebli Atrash, Barry Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Priyanka VenkateshDivision of Hematology and Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Razan MansourDepartment of Medical Hematology and Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Yara ShatnawiFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0001-9068-5474
Akhil JainDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7298-4246
Christopher StrouseDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Nausheen AhmedDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66205, USA.
Muhammad Umair MushtaqDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66205, USA.
Al-Ola AbdallahDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6603-185X
Shebli AtrashLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4547-7534
Barry PaulLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) represents the most aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia with a poor prognosis and survival of <3 years. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) adopted more inclusive diagnostic criteria for pPCL in 2021, including patients with 5% or more circulating plasma cells (down from 20%). Most published studies of pPCL do not include patients who meet the criteria for pPCL based on the newer diagnostic guidelines, and the data on the optimal treatment of pPCL is scarce. In our multi-center retrospective analysis, we report data on treatment regimens used in 67 pPCL patients to characterize outcomes in this population.

methodsWe included patients with newly diagnosed pPCL between 2010 and 2023 based on the 2021 IMWG definition at one of three academic centers.

resultsOur results suggest significant improvement in overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) with the use of autologous stem cell transplant, but without additional benefit for a tandem transplant. The presence of high-risk cytogenetics was an independent risk factor for progression in the cohort.

conclusionsOur dataset represents one of the largest cohorts to date using the expanded definition of pPCL adopted by the IMWG in 2021 and stresses the importance of taking pPCL patients to transplant. Unfortunately, our study was not powered to determine the efficacy of individual induction and maintenance regimens, and many patients diagnosed with pPCL are ineligible for transplant based on end-organ damage at diagnosis or from disease that is refractory to induction therapy, underscoring the need for early diagnosis and treatment in hopes of preserving transplant eligibility.

Indexed as

plasma cell dyscrasiasplasma cell leukemiastem cell transplant

Identifiers

PMID41514683
PMCPMC12785085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.