Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514608›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Vitreoretinal Surgery for Intraocular Complications Following Radiotherapy Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.

Thomas Joseph Padley, Rumana Hussain, Antonio Eleuteri, Hung-Da Chou, Carl Groenewald, Heinrich Heimann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The optimal approach to the primary treatment of uveal melanoma: a narrative review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas Joseph PadleyLiverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Prescott Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3835-6542
Rumana HussainLiverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Prescott Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK.
Antonio EleuteriResearch & Innovation Department, NHS University Hospitals of Liverpool Group, Edwards Building, Liverpool L7 8YE, UK.
Hung-Da ChouLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences (ILCaMS), University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Carl GroenewaldLiverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Prescott Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK.
Heinrich HeimannLiverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Prescott Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Globe-sparing radiotherapy is widely utilised in the treatment of uveal melanoma, but often results in complications requiring vitreoretinal intervention. The outcomes of secondary vitrectomy remain unclear. A multidisciplinary approach involving vitreoretinal and ocular oncology specialists is essential to managing complications. (2) Methods: We reviewed 1794 patients treated with radiotherapy for uveal melanoma between 2012 and 2022. In total, 70 patients underwent secondary vitrectomy after primary radiotherapy treatment. The outcomes included overall tumour control and visual outcome. (3) Results: Complications requiring vitrectomy were more common after proton-beam radiotherapy than plaque brachytherapy (5.4% versus 3.0%). Common indications included vitreous haemorrhage (39%) and retinal detachment/toxic tumour syndrome (31%). The affected tumours were larger, more often ciliary body in origin, and associated with a worse prognosis. Vitrectomy patients had higher rates of enucleation (9% versus 3%), metastasis (16% versus 6%), and visual decline (average 0.60 LogMAR), with limited visual improvement (≥3-line gain in 13%). Proton-beam patients had worse outcomes than plaque brachytherapy patients. (4) Conclusions: Vitreoretinal complications after uveal melanoma radiotherapy are rare, but timely treatment by those with experience may enable patients to keep their eye in situations where enucleation would be the only alternative. Patients and clinicians must understand the risks of complications to make informed decisions about treatment plans, with vitreoretinal surgeons and ocular oncologists key to outcomes.

Indexed as

radiotherapyuveal melanomavitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID41514608
PMCPMC12785044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.