Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514573›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Automated Baseline-Correction and Signal-Detection Algorithms with Web-Based Implementation for Thermal Liquid Biopsy Data Analysis.

Karl C Reger, Gabriela Schneider, Keegan T Line, Alagammai Kaliappan, Robert Buscaglia, Nichola C Garbett

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karl C RegerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-4312-7844
Gabriela SchneiderUofL Health-Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2088-8695
Keegan T LineDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.
Alagammai KaliappanUofL Health-Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Robert BuscagliaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9325-1148
Nichola C GarbettUofL Health-Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-554X

Funding

Enhanced diagnostic assessment in lupus using differential scanning calorimetryR01AI129959 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GARBETT, NICHOLA C. · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01AI129959NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI129959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesDifferential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of blood plasma, also known as thermal liquid biopsy (TLB), is a promising approach for disease detection and monitoring; however, its wider adoption in clinical settings has been hindered by labor-intensive data processing workflows, particularly baseline correction.

methodsWe developed and tested two automated algorithms to address critical bottlenecks in TLB analysis: (1) a baseline-correction algorithm utilizing rolling-variance analysis for endpoint detection, and (2) a signal-detection algorithm that applies auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA)-based stationarity testing to determine whether a profile contains interpretable thermal features. Both algorithms are implemented in ThermogramForge, an open-source R Shiny web application providing an end-to-end workflow for data upload, processing, and report generation.

resultsThe baseline-correction algorithm demonstrated excellent performance on plasma TLB data (characterized by high heat capacity), matching the quality of rigorous manual processing. However, its performance was less robust for low signal biofluids, such as urine, where weak thermal transitions reduce the reliability of baseline estimation. To address this, a complementary signal-detection algorithm was developed to screen for TLB profiles with discernable thermal transitions prior to baseline correction, enabling users to exclude non-informative data. The signal-detection algorithm achieved near-perfect classification accuracy for TLB profiles with well-defined thermal transitions and maintained a low false-positive rate of 3.1% for true noise profiles, with expected lower performance for borderline cases. The interactive review interface in ThermogramForge further supports quality control and expert refinement.

conclusionsThe automated baseline-correction and signal-detection algorithms, together with their web-based implementation, substantially reduce analysis time while maintaining quality, supporting more efficient and reproducible TLB research.

Indexed as

baseline-correction algorithmblood plasmadifferential scanning calorimetry (DSC)signal-detection algorithmthermal liquid biopsy (TLB)TLB profileurineweb application

Identifiers

PMID41514573
PMCPMC12785043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.