ArticleCancers2025
Automated Baseline-Correction and Signal-Detection Algorithms with Web-Based Implementation for Thermal Liquid Biopsy Data Analysis.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Severity-Dependent Modulation of Red Blood Cell Aging Patterns in Preeclampsia: Insights from Calorimetry and Atomic Force Microscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Pilot Exploratory Study of Serum Differential Scanning Calorimetry in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Reveals Preliminary Outcome-Related Proteome-Level Thermodynamic Patterns.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDifferential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of blood plasma, also known as thermal liquid biopsy (TLB), is a promising approach for disease detection and monitoring; however, its wider adoption in clinical settings has been hindered by labor-intensive data processing workflows, particularly baseline correction.
methodsWe developed and tested two automated algorithms to address critical bottlenecks in TLB analysis: (1) a baseline-correction algorithm utilizing rolling-variance analysis for endpoint detection, and (2) a signal-detection algorithm that applies auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA)-based stationarity testing to determine whether a profile contains interpretable thermal features. Both algorithms are implemented in ThermogramForge, an open-source R Shiny web application providing an end-to-end workflow for data upload, processing, and report generation.
resultsThe baseline-correction algorithm demonstrated excellent performance on plasma TLB data (characterized by high heat capacity), matching the quality of rigorous manual processing. However, its performance was less robust for low signal biofluids, such as urine, where weak thermal transitions reduce the reliability of baseline estimation. To address this, a complementary signal-detection algorithm was developed to screen for TLB profiles with discernable thermal transitions prior to baseline correction, enabling users to exclude non-informative data. The signal-detection algorithm achieved near-perfect classification accuracy for TLB profiles with well-defined thermal transitions and maintained a low false-positive rate of 3.1% for true noise profiles, with expected lower performance for borderline cases. The interactive review interface in ThermogramForge further supports quality control and expert refinement.
conclusionsThe automated baseline-correction and signal-detection algorithms, together with their web-based implementation, substantially reduce analysis time while maintaining quality, supporting more efficient and reproducible TLB research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.