Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514567›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

The Role of Organ Sparing Approaches After Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.

Gianluca Rizzo, Vincenzo Tondolo, Luca Emanuele Amodio, Federica Marzi, Camilla Marandola, Donato Paolo Pafundi, Giuseppe De Rito, Claudio Coco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gianluca RizzoDigestive and Colo-Rectal Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-0472
Vincenzo TondoloDigestive and Colo-Rectal Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0256-3766
Luca Emanuele AmodioDigestive and Colo-Rectal Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-1636-5766
Federica MarziDigestive and Colo-Rectal Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6767-0461
Camilla MarandolaDigestive and Colo-Rectal Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy.
Donato Paolo PafundiGeneral Surgery 2 Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8981-9949
Giuseppe De RitoGeneral Surgery 2 Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Claudio CocoGeneral Surgery 2 Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-7093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ-preserving strategies have gained increasing relevance in the management of rectal cancer, driven by the improved ability of neoadjuvant therapies to induce major and complete tumor regression. The introduction of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT), delivered through induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, has substantially increased both pathological and clinical complete response rates. This progress has renewed interest in non-operative management-namely Watch-and-Wait (W&W)-and in local excision (LE) as potential alternatives to total mesorectal excision (TME). However, the W&W strategy raises important oncologic concerns, including a non-negligible rate of local regrowth-consistently reported at approximately 20-30%-which is associated with inferior distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival. These limitations underscore the inherent uncertainty in reliably defining a true clinical complete response. Within this context, LE may serve as a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic modality by confirming the pathological response, improving local control through removal of residual resistant tumor clones, and enabling more accurate stratification of patients suitable for organ preservation versus those requiring completion TME. Overall, while TNT has expanded the therapeutic opportunities for rectal preservation, LE appears to play a critical role in reducing the discordance between clinical and pathological assessment, thereby offering a more oncologically secure pathway toward organ preservation. This narrative review discusses the current role, benefits, and limitations of organ-preserving approaches after TNT in both locally advanced and early rectal cancer.

Indexed as

local excisionorgan-sparing approachrectal cancertotal neoadjuvant treatmentwatch & wait

Identifiers

PMID41514567
PMCPMC12784717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.