ArticleCancers2025
Response Prediction of Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Using Rapid Semi-Automated Flow Cytometry.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: The effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer varies greatly among patients, and no reliable biomarker for predicting treatment response currently exists. We investigated whether cell cycle analysis using rapid semi-automated flow cytometry could predict the effectiveness of CRT. (2) Methods: This prospective study included 32 patients with rectal cancer undergoing CRT. The cell cycle of biopsy specimens from rectal cancer patients before CRT was semi-automatically and rapidly analyzed using Celltac PEAK as flow cytometer. The proportion of cell cycle phases is compared with treatment response after CRT. (3) Results: Patients with a tumor reduction rate ≥ 30% on CT showed a significantly higher proportion of cells in the Over G2/M phase compared with those with <30% reduction (median 2.45% vs. 0.95%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.