Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514460›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2026

Clinical implementation of endolysins targeting gram-positive bacteria points toward a combination strategy with standard-of-care antibiotics: a selective review.

Niels Vander Elst

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Niels Vander ElstDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum 7D, Solnavägen 9 Solna, 17165, Stockholm, Sweden. niels.vander.elst@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endolysins, which are peptidoglycan hydrolases derived from bacteriophages, are expected to innovate antimicrobial treatment. More specifically, several endolysins that target gram-positive bacteria are currently being evaluated in clinical trials, reflecting increasing interest in their therapeutic application. Research involving endolysins has expanded exponentially over the last 20 years, which has resulted in a substantial diversification. With most of the field having focused on endolysin discovery, biochemical characterization and applying protein engineering strategies, it remains unclear whether endolysins should eventually be implemented as stand-alone antimicrobials or alongside standard-of-care antibiotics, an ambiguity that is also reflected in the endolysins that are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. This selective review, inspired by a selection of preclinical studies in which endolysin monotherapy had inconsistent outcomes, concludes that endolysins hold their greatest therapeutic potential when used in combination with standard-of-care antibiotics, except in cases, where therapy is limited to a local or topical application only. In the latter, antibiotic supplementation can negatively impact the microbiome that is essential to maintain, for example, skin, ear, eye, nasopharyngeal, gut and vaginal homeostasis. By combining endolysins with antibiotics that preferably target the bacterial cell wall or membrane, such as β-lactams, as well as lipo- and glycopeptides, synergistic or additive effects can be exploited that substantially reduce minimal inhibitory concentrations, restoring antibiotic susceptibility in otherwise resistant bacteria. Overall, this selective review asserts that endolysins may be best implemented alongside standard-of-care antibiotics, as this may lead to more consistent and reliable clinical outcomes, particularly in systemic infections.

Indexed as

AMRAntibiotic resistanceAntibiotic-resistant infectionAntibioticsBacteriophage-derived endolysinBeta-lactamClinicalEndolysinGlycopeptideGram-positiveLipopeptide

Identifiers

PMID41514460
PMCPMC12849448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.