ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2026
Clinical implementation of endolysins targeting gram-positive bacteria points toward a combination strategy with standard-of-care antibiotics: a selective review.
Review in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Biological Approach to Antimicrobial Resistance in New and Old Bacterial Pathogens.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Antibiotic Resistance and the Return to a Pre-Antibiotic Era: A Critical Narrative Review of a Global Catastrophe.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Antibacterial Efficacy of Recombinant Endolysin S.AgEndo1332 in Combination with Antibiotics against Mastitis-Associated S. aureus in a Mouse Mastitis Model.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Physicochemical and Proteolytic Barriers Limiting Activity of Cpl-1 and Pal Endolysins in Human Circulation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Translational barriers to phage endolysin deployment for antimicrobial resistance control in Africa.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endolysins, which are peptidoglycan hydrolases derived from bacteriophages, are expected to innovate antimicrobial treatment. More specifically, several endolysins that target gram-positive bacteria are currently being evaluated in clinical trials, reflecting increasing interest in their therapeutic application. Research involving endolysins has expanded exponentially over the last 20 years, which has resulted in a substantial diversification. With most of the field having focused on endolysin discovery, biochemical characterization and applying protein engineering strategies, it remains unclear whether endolysins should eventually be implemented as stand-alone antimicrobials or alongside standard-of-care antibiotics, an ambiguity that is also reflected in the endolysins that are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. This selective review, inspired by a selection of preclinical studies in which endolysin monotherapy had inconsistent outcomes, concludes that endolysins hold their greatest therapeutic potential when used in combination with standard-of-care antibiotics, except in cases, where therapy is limited to a local or topical application only. In the latter, antibiotic supplementation can negatively impact the microbiome that is essential to maintain, for example, skin, ear, eye, nasopharyngeal, gut and vaginal homeostasis. By combining endolysins with antibiotics that preferably target the bacterial cell wall or membrane, such as β-lactams, as well as lipo- and glycopeptides, synergistic or additive effects can be exploited that substantially reduce minimal inhibitory concentrations, restoring antibiotic susceptibility in otherwise resistant bacteria. Overall, this selective review asserts that endolysins may be best implemented alongside standard-of-care antibiotics, as this may lead to more consistent and reliable clinical outcomes, particularly in systemic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.