ArticleBMC surgery2026
Infarct-to-spleen volume ratio as a novel volumetric predictor of splenectomy in splenic infarction.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSplenic infarction is a rare and often underrecognized condition with diverse etiologies and variable clinical presentations. While most cases are managed conservatively, identifying patients who may require surgical intervention remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the infarct-to-spleen volume ratio (ISR) as a radiologic predictor for splenectomy in patients with splenic infarction and to propose a risk stratification model incorporating ISR and fever.
methodsIn this retrospective, two-center cross-sectional study, 236 patients diagnosed with splenic infarction between January 2015 and January 2023 were included. Volumetric analysis was performed using contrast-enhanced CT to calculate ISR. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic features were compared between surgical (n = 13) and non-surgical (n = 223) groups. ROC curve and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate predictive parameters for splenectomy. A risk score based on ISR and fever status was developed to stratify patients into risk categories.
resultsThe splenectomy rate was 5.6%. Patients who underwent splenectomy had significantly higher ISR (median 28.2 vs. 9.17, p = 0.02). ROC analysis identified ISR as a strong predictor for surgery (AUC = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.86), with a specificity of 77.9% and NPV of 97.2%. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed ISR (OR: 1.03, p = 0.002) and fever (OR: 2.69, p = 0.005) as independent predictors. A risk score (range 0–4) based on these variables stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with splenectomy rates of 1.5%, 6.3%, and 33.3%, respectively.
conclusionISR is a novel, objective predictor of the need for splenectomy in patients with splenic infarction. Incorporating ISR and fever into a simple risk score may aid clinical decision-making and help identify candidates for early conservative management or outpatient follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.