Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514361›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

ERNIE-Evaluating Response to an individualized Neuropsychological IntervEntion for children with brain tumors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Roxanna Hofman, Rachèl Kemps, Jeanine M Voorman, Femke K Aarsen, Marita Partanen

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roxanna HofmanPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2294-2086
Rachèl KempsPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-0995
Jeanine M VoormanPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0290-8889
Femke K AarsenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5219-7436
Marita PartanenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.h.partanen@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-9778

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 14645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough survival rates for children with brain tumors have improved, many face neuropsychological challenges that can affect quality of life and daily functioning. Existing interventions are typically standardized, with limited evidence supporting their effectiveness, and often do not explicitly target individual or systemic needs. The ERNIE study aims to address these gaps by evaluating the efficacy and process of an individualized, family-centered neuropsychological intervention. The primary research question is to evaluate the efficacy of an individualized versus standardized neuropsychological intervention immediately after treatment completion.

methodsThe ERNIE study is a single-center, prospective, superiority randomized controlled trial at the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology in the Netherlands. Eligible participants are children aged 8 to 17 years with cognitive problems following completion of brain tumor treatment. Enrollment began in November 2024 and will continue for two years, with the study team aiming to recruit 144 participants. Participants and parents are randomly assigned (1:1) to an individualized or a standardized neuropsychological intervention, each comprising six sessions of psychoeducation and strategy training over three months. Randomization is stratified by age (8-12/13-17 years) and cognitive impairment (mild/severe). Outcome assessors and families are blinded to allocation, whereas therapists cannot be blinded due to the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome is Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), assessed through a patient and parent interview post-intervention. Other outcomes are goal satisfaction, cognitive and psychosocial outcomes, and measures of the intervention process, including recruitment feasibility, intervention completion, data collection, and implementation factors such as facilitators and barriers. A six-month internal pilot will provide an early assessment to inform study procedures. Assessments occur pre-intervention, post-intervention (~ 3 months), and follow-up (~ 12 months). Safety monitoring aligns with low-risk studies. DISCUSSION: The ERNIE study compares an individualized neuropsychological approach with a standardized approach. By integrating outcome assessment with process evaluation, the study seeks to generate evidence on both efficacy and implementation feasibility. Findings may help shape future clinical practices by investigating the impact of individualized neuropsychological interventions to improve daily functioning in this vulnerable group of children.

trial registrationISRCTN trial registry ISRCTN30985676, registered on 04 October 2024. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN30985676 .

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCognitionAdolescentChildChild BehaviorEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBrain neoplasmsChildCognitionIntervention studiesNeuropsychologyRandomized controlled trialsRehabilitationStudy protocols

Identifiers

PMID41514361
PMCPMC12882407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.