ArticleVirology journal2026
African warthog buffy coat cells retain susceptibility to African swine fever virus following whole blood transportation and storage.
Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spread of African Swine Fever (ASF) across much of the world is a profound challenge to both domestic and wild Suidae populations. While vaccine and countermeasure development for domestic swine are ongoing, the understanding of ASF within wildlife is limited. This gap in knowledge is largely due to the requirements of working with African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) in high containment laboratories, the complexity of utilizing wildlife in these settings, and researcher access to non-native species. Researching the role of ASFV within wildlife primary cells, outside a vivarium, is currently limited by the need to utilize either terminal processing procedures, such as harvesting alveolar macrophages or bone marrow, or processes requiring large volumes of blood, such as peripheral blood mononuclear cell harvests. The limited availability and access restrictions of susceptible wildlife makes obtaining these samples difficult, especially when working with endangered wildlife species. Harvesting buffy coat fractions is independent of terminal methodologies and the need for large volumes of blood. A methodology to support ASFV replication has recently been demonstrated utilizing domestic swine blood derived buffy coat cells. Through establishing collaborations with zoological partners, we apply this methodology to small volumes of blood from an African Warthog, a known ASF susceptible species. These results demonstrate the value of such partnerships and how they may be utilized in the future to evaluate ASFV in wildlife derived cells in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.