ArticleBMC oral health2026
Effect of tongue hygiene instruction on periodontal patients: an experimental study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dietary Sulfur Compounds and Halitosis: Bridging Food Science, Microbial Metabolism, and Oral Health: A Comprehensive Review.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough tongue cleaning provides various benefits such as reducing dental plaque, improving halitosis, managing gingival inflammation, and enhancing subjective taste, many people do not include tongue hygiene in their oral health habits. This study aimed to assess the frequency of tongue cleaning and the effect of tongue hygiene instruction on oral hygiene habits among periodontal patients.
methodsA total of 222 patients, diagnosed with gingivitis or periodontitis, participated in this study. Participants completed a questionnaire before and one month after receiving tongue hygiene instruction. The questionnaire included demographic information and a section for tongue cleaning habits. The instruction was delivered using educational models and a leaflet prepared by the authors. Data were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, independent samples t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and McNemar test, with significance set at P < 0.05.
resultsInitially, 32.9% of participants practiced tongue cleaning, with women (68.5%, P < 0.001), non-smokers (91.8%, P < 0.001), and patients with gingivitis (69.9%, P < 0.001) showing significantly higher rates. After instruction, the prevalence of tongue cleaning increased to 76.2%, with daily cleaning rising from 11.2% to 45.4% (P < 0.001). The instruction was particularly effective for participants with periodontitis (increased from 35.4% to 51.4%) and those without a college education (52.1% to 70.6%), with both being statistically significant (P < 0.001). Additionally, 42.6% of participants reported improved taste perception, particularly among those over 60 years of age (P < 0.001).
conclusionTongue hygiene instruction significantly improved tongue cleaning habits and oral hygiene among periodontal patients, emphasizing the importance of targeted educational interventions. Tongue hygiene instructions should be a part of routine dental care to raise patient awareness, which in turn promotes better adherence to the practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.