ReviewBMC neurology2026
False-positive tricyclic antidepressant results in diphenhydramine overdose: a report of two cases and a literature review.
Review in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiphenhydramine (DPH) is a common over-the-counter medication. DPH overdoses occur across all age groups, and abuse among adolescents has been increasing in recent years. We report two adolescent cases in which a false-positive tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) reaction on a urinary drug screening kit (UDS) led to the diagnosis of DPH poisoning, with a discussion of the mechanism of false positives based on an experiment using UDS and a literature review of the false positive cases by DPH. CASE REPORTS: Case 1: A 13-year-old female patient was admitted for confusion and seizures. A UDS, SIGNIFY EXPERIMENT: DPH standard samples were added to urine from a healthy adult to create urine samples with multiple concentrations of DPH, which were subsequently used in SIG. Although the result was TCA-negative at 100 µg/mL, it turned out to be false positive at 500 µg/mL, suggesting that the kit-specific threshold concentration for TCA false positivity exists between 100 and 500 µg/mL. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsOur cases and literature review indicate that SIG is prone to yield false positive TCA results in DPH overdose. Considering the increasing incidence of over-the-counter medication overdoses among adolescents in Japan, it is anticipated that there will be more pediatric cases of DPH poisoning in emergency departments. When a TCA-positive result is obtained on SIG, clinicians should consider not only TCA intoxication but also the possibility of DPH overdose. The mechanism of false positives cannot be explained by DPH alone, and the involvement of metabolites is suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.