ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Exploring moral distress in research students in a paediatric humanitarian research setting: a qualitative study from the Mavrovouni closed controlled access center, Lesvos, Greece.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moral distress refers to the emotional distress experienced when an individual’s moral or ethical beliefs are violated. This concept has been widely studied in a number of disciplines, but limited attention has been given to the moral distress experienced by researchers in the humanitarian setting. This paper aims to explore the ethical challenges and resulting moral distress faced by paediatric humanitarian research students in the Mavrovouni Closed Controlled Access Center, Lesvos, Greece. Based on a qualitative approach, we conducted three ethics support workshops with 5 to 10 participants each, in which they were invited to discuss the moral dilemmas they were experiencing in their research work. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed; transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Seven main themes were developed: community and system-level considerations, witnessing and moral responsibility, conflicting duties, participant benefit misconception, coping strategies, cultural aspects, and theories of change. These themes highlight the diverse ethical dilemmas research students face in this field. The results of this study will contribute to the development of support systems for researchers working in sensitive data collection and promote a more sustainable and healthy research practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.