ArticleBMC nursing2026
Health status, health behavior and perceived stress of nursing staff in Germany: a scoping review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Results of the validated German Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) from a large German cohort of healthy adults and different disease groups compared to historical reference values.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn view of increasing work-related burdens resulting from staff shortages, demographic changes, and high physical and psychological demands, there is a growing need for an understanding of the health status of nursing staff in Germany. The aim of this review is to consolidate existing knowledge on nurses’ health, health behaviors, and subjective stress perceptions to highlight existing research gaps, and to provide impetus for the development of future health-promoting interventions.
methodsTo analyze the research field, a scoping review was conducted following the JBI methodology. The systematic literature search was carried out using CINAHL, PubMed, and CareLit- databases and was supplemented by searches of the preprint servers OpenGrey and MedRxiv. In addition, a targeted supplementary search for relevant publications was also conducted on selected pertinent websites.
resultsA total of 11,006 titles and abstracts were screened, of which 150 full texts were reviewed, resulting in the inclusion of 90 studies. The literature predominantly focused on nurses’ mental health. Physical health and health-related behaviors were examined less frequently. Results consistently indicate a high burden of morbidity and substantial work-related stress, which have significant implications for individual well-being, professional performance, and long-term retention in the nursing profession. These challenges have been further intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. Protective factors such as team cohesion and recognition have emerged repeatedly, highlighting the importance of supportive work environments. Although some interventions have demonstrated short-term improvements in mental health outcomes, robust evidence of long-term effects and physical health promotion remains limited.
conclusionsNursing staff are exposed to a wide range of health risks and high work-related burdens. Despite a broad body of research, substantial gaps remain - particularly regarding health behaviors and physical health. Future research requires longitudinal, comparative studies, and a structured, nursing-specific health monitoring system. In practice, comprehensive strategies that combine individual-level interventions with structural improvements in the work environment are needed. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HX9ZM . CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.