ArticleBMC nursing2026
Exploring how organizational support shapes nurses' clinical leadership: evidence from Tunisia.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical nurse leadership is a key driver for improving care quality within the ongoing reform of the Tunisian healthcare system. This study aimed to assess the correlation between nurses’ clinical leadership levels and the organizational support available to them, as well as to identify individual and professional factors associated with clinical leadership.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among nurses in the Sahel region (Sousse, Monastir, and Mahdia), using two validated instruments: the Clinical Leadership Survey (CLS) and the Organizational Environment Assessment (OEA) scales. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses (t-tests and ANOVA), and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data.
resultsA total of 508 nurses participated. They demonstrated a satisfactory level of clinical leadership (M = 54.15 ± 8.64), particularly in communication and collaboration. Perceived organizational support was moderate (M = 16.20 ± 3.46). A significant positive correlation was found between clinical leadership and organizational support (r = 0.501; p < 0.001). Bivariate analysis showed that female gender (p = 0.021), prior leadership training (p = 0.004), longer work experience (p = 0.017), and older age (p = 0.045) were significantly associated with higher CLS scores. In the multivariate model, previous training (p = 0.002), female gender (p = 0.028), and work experience > 10 years (p = 0.034) remained independent predictors, while age showed a marginal association (p = 0.067).
conclusionOrganizational support plays a crucial role in fostering clinical nurse leadership. In addition to structural support, individual factors such as training, experience, and gender also influence leadership expression. Investing in professional recognition, continuing education, and participatory governance is essential for strengthening leadership capacities and improving the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.