ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Addressing activities related to food supplements in European pharmacists' codes of ethics: textual analysis and proposals for ethical standards.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe exploding food supplement trade makes ensuring and monitoring their proper use and risk minimization by individuals increasingly difficult. Even though there is a common legal framework for those activities in the European Union (EU), too little importance has been given to respecting ethics in making them available to patients. Pharmacists involved in activities related to food supplements could play a decisive role in protecting the rights of patients who use them. The purpose of this study was to determine the position of European pharmacists in this field and to propose ethical standards for their activities related to food supplements.
methodsWe used textual analysis to investigate the pharmacists' codes of ethics in force in the EU Member States. Our findings led us to develop proposals to optimize the ethical standards for pharmacist activities related to food supplements. To position our proposals internationally, we performed a comparative analysis with ethical standards adopted in Australia and the United States (US).
resultsMost of the codes of ethics we analysed address some of those activities through explicit and/or implicit provisions. From those provisions, we derived common ethical standards regarding the responsibility of pharmacists for the quality, safety and effectiveness of food supplements dispensed from pharmacies and for honesty and loyalty in promoting and advertising food supplements. As policy recommendations, we proposed optimized ethical standards, including standards for research and development, marketing notification, manufacturing, wholesale distribution, market surveillance, and risk management of food supplements. In the Australian Code of Ethics and US guidelines, we observed similar standards for most of these activities.
conclusionsEstablishing ethical standards for all pharmacists' activities related to food supplements would stimulate discussion, reflection, the evolution of their codes of ethics and practices, and professional development. The standards we proposed could serve as a starting point for developing national and international policies, using the motivational power of ethics. The commitment of professional associations of pharmacists, food companies, and competent health authorities to adopt ethical policies in all activities related to food supplements would make an important contribution to respecting patients' rights in using them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.