Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514209›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Being done with "it": forensic psychiatric patients' experiences with the development and treatment for co-occurring substance use disorders and mental disorders.

Johan Green, A S Lindqvist Bagge, E Punzi, P Andiné, M Wallinius, M Hildebrand Karlén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johan GreenCentre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. johan.green@gu.se.
A S Lindqvist BaggeCentre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
E PunziCentre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
P AndinéCentre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
M WalliniusCentre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
M Hildebrand KarlénCentre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-occurring substance use disorders, and mental disorders are associated with significant suffering, high risks of violent reoffending and relapse in both substance use and psychotic episodes. Treatment for co-occurring substance use disorders in forensic mental health settings would benefit from incorporating patients’ understanding of their disorders.

methodUsing an interpretative phenomenological analysis, this study explored and interpreted the experiences of 13 Swedish forensic psychiatric patients regarding the development of, and being treated for, co-occurring disorders.

resultsThe analysis yielded four experiential themes: “substituting a missing tool”, “’it’: a self-sustaining ecosystem”, “treated but not cared for”, “comprehending fragments of the self”. Results illustrated how substance use, mental and physical health and social worlds fused into an interconnected ecosystem (referred to as “it”) where negative developments in any domain risked inducing relapse. Diagnosis-focused treatment was perceived as disconnected from this reality, leading to selective censorship and treatment disengagement. In understanding their past, patients experienced a fragmentation between their identities resulting in the conceptualisation of an “addict self” who inhabited “it” and who was separate from their current, “moral self”.

conclusionFlexible treatment approaches that address early-life trauma and that assist in integrating patients’ past actions, present vulnerabilities, and future potential are beneficial to the forensic mental health services. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Forensic PsychiatryMental DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersAdultComorbidityDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSwedenCo-occurring disordersForensic psychiatryIdentity transitionInterpretative phenomenological analysisPatient-centred careQualitative researchSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID41514209
PMCPMC12849733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.