ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026
Transcranial direct current stimulation eliminates the own-age bias as indexed by the face inversion effect for own- versus other-age faces.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) at Fp3-Fp2 Reduces the Face Inversion Effect: Evidence Against an Expectancy Account.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) via the Fp3-Fp2 montage disrupts face recognition skills.Oxford open neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate individuals' reduced ability to recognize faces of other ages, a phenomenon known as the Own-Age Bias (OAB). This study utilized a double-blind, between-subjects design in which anodal tDCS (10 minutes duration, 1.5 mA intensity, targeting the Fp3 location) was applied to disrupt the face inversion effect (FIE), which reflects higher recognition performance for upright compared to upside-down faces. Young adults participated in an old/new recognition task, where upright and inverted 'own-age' faces (19-30 years) and 'other-age' faces (older, 69-80 years) were presented. In the sham/control condition (n = 24), we observed a robust OAB, indicated by a significantly larger FIE for own-age faces compared to other-age faces. Importantly, in the anodal tDCS condition (n = 24), the FIE for own-age faces was significantly reduced compared to the sham condition, effectively eliminating the cross-age interaction index of the OAB. We interpret our results through a perceptual expertise-based account of the OAB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.