Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514174›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of nursing practice2026

Missed Care Prevalence and Associated Factors in Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Afia Achiaa Sarpong, Lucy Gent, Amanda Towell-Barnard, Diana Arabiat

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of nursing practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient-Count and Perceived Workload Associations With Missed Nursing Care: A Multicenter Repeated-Measures Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Afia Achiaa SarpongSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6827-3177
Lucy GentCentre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Amanda Towell-BarnardSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Diana ArabiatSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, AustraliaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the study was to comprehensively analyse the prevalence and factors associated with missed nursing care in acute care settings.

methodsA systematic review was conducted to estimate the prevalence of missed nursing care, types of activities missed and associated factors in acute care hospital settings. Five electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PubMed and Scopus) were searched from inception to 14th December 2022. Type of missed care and associated factors were classified based on missed care concepts, definition and measurement. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate proportions and levels of types of nursing activities missed.

resultsA total of 45 studies recruited 139 454 nurses reporting missed care activities. The most frequent activity missed was ambulation, with estimated prevalence of 46% (95%, CI [0.37, 0.55] I

conclusionsThis study reports significant missed basic nursing activities in healthcare settings globally, suggesting greater odds of unsafe patient outcomes of hospitalisation. Targeted preventative strategies need to be tailored to specific missed care activities.

Indexed as

Nursing CareNursing Staff, HospitalHumansPrevalencecare left undonemeta‐analysismissednursing carepatient outcomesprevalence

Identifiers

PMID41514174
PMCPMC12789284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.