ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026
Race/color functional limitation disparities in a "racial democracy": findings among middle-aged and older adults in Brazil.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBrazil is rapidly aging and expected to have increased rates of functional limitation. While some literature has analyzed race/color functional limitation disparities, no documented research has examined such disparities between age groups that lived through Brazil's different political regimes. Guided by a life course perspective, we examine this research gap.
methodsWe used wave 1 (2015-2016) data (n = 8,980) from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study on Aging to examine race/color disparities in difficulty with mobility, episodic memory, near vision, and hearing. We computed age group-specific (i.e., 50-59; 60-69; 70-79; 80+) regression models of each difficulty while adjusting for demographic (age, sex), early-life (urban/rural childhood, mother's education, father's education, childhood health), socioeconomic (education, household income, work demand), health (comorbidities, medical care), social ties (marital status, living children, household size), and place (region, urban/rural residence) characteristics.
resultsIn ages 50-59, compared to White respondents, Black, Brown, and Indigenous respondents reported variations of greater difficulty with mobility, episodic memory, near vision, and hearing. In ages 60-69 and 70-79, Black and Brown respondents had worse episodic memory, while only Brown respondents had worse near vision. In ages 80+, only Brown respondents had worse episodic memory but better near vision. Early-life and place factors accounted for many of the Black and Brown disparities, respectively. DISCUSSION: Race/color disparities in functional limitation were less common among the older, particularly Black, segment of Brazil's population, while factors that shaped these disparities varied by race/color. This variance is influenced by divergent life conditions in 20th-century Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.