ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Design Rules for Robust Coronary Artery Segmentation: A Systematic Analysis of Dataset Size, Windowing, Architectures, and Vessel Geometry.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAutomated coronary artery segmentation from computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) can support quantitative analysis, yet performance varies with data characteristics and model configuration. This study systematically evaluates how dataset size, computed tomography (CT) window width and level (W/L) values, model architectures, and vessel geometry affect nnU-Net-based coronary artery segmentation.
methodsUsing 1000 annotated CTCA scans from the publicly available ImageCAS dataset, we conducted a series of experiments in which we varied the number of training cases, applied different W/L values, compared 2D and multiple 3D nnU-Net architectures (Full-Resolution, Low-Resolution, Cascade, and ensemble), and assessed performance across vessel curvature and tortuosity. All models were evaluated on an independent 200-case test set using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU).
resultsSegmentation performance increased with dataset size and plateaued beyond 100 training cases. W/L values of 800/200 Hounsfield units (HU) and 1300/350 HU slightly improved performance over original images. 3D models outperformed the 2D model, with the 3D ensemble achieving the highest accuracy (DSC 0.8337; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8269-0.8405, IoU 0.7178; 95% CI: 0.7080-0.7275). Performance remained consistent across vessels with different curvature and tortuosity, indicating model robustness to geometric complexity.
conclusionThe nnU-Net framework achieves accurate and generalizable coronary artery segmentation across diverse dataset sizes, W/L values, model architectures, and vessel geometries. Optimizing input settings and architectural strategies further enhances segmentation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41514152What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.