ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Unlocking Insights from Postictal EEGs: Investigating Predictive Markers of Seizure Recurrence.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lightweight deep learning model for nonconvulsive status epilepticus diagnosis using EEG time-frequency analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSeizure recurrence, often presenting as clusters, is a major clinical concern linked to increased morbidity. The immediate postictal period is a critical yet understudied window where recurrence frequently arises. This study evaluates whether EEG features from postictal intervals can distinguish postictal-to-ictal (P-I) from postictal-to-interictal (P-Inter) transitions, enabling early recurrence prediction.
methodsEEG data from the CHB-MIT database were analyzed, comprising 73 postictal episodes from seven patients (44 P-I, 29 P-Inter). Each episode was segmented into 10-second windows, yielding 876 segments. Fifty wavelet-based features were extracted from low-sample entropy channels and classified using Decision Tree (DT) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models. Performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation and, to test inter-patient generalization, per-patient stratified nested cross-validation.
resultsIn subject-independent nested CV, DT achieved accuracy 0.75 (95% CI ± 0.029), sensitivity 0.73 (±0.041), specificity 0.77 (±0.038), F1-score 0.70 (±0.032), AUC 0.75 (±0.028), and FPR 0.20 (±0.039). LSTM yielded accuracy 0.71 (±0.027), sensitivity 0.69 (±0.066), specificity 0.72 (±0.069), F1-score 0.65 (±0.027), AUC 0.73 (±0.035), and FPR 0.28 (±0.069). Under patient-stratified evaluation, accuracy decreased to 0.67 (±0.076) for DT and 0.65 (±0.093) for LSTM, reflecting inter-patient variability.
conclusionThese proof-of-concept findings indicate that postictal EEG, particularly P-I transitions, may encode information relevant to seizure recurrence. While the observed performance remains moderate, these results provide preliminary evidence warranting further investigation rather than indicating immediate clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41514151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.