Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514147›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2026

Reactive oxygen species in the rhizosphere orchestrate the recruitment of beneficial bacteria.

Xijie Guo, Hengyi Dai, Zhiyi Jia, Ying Peng, Luotian Lu, Yaxing Su, Jianwei Li, Qinghong Li, Zeming Huang, Yucheng Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xijie Guo *Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Hengyi Dai *State Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-979X
Zhiyi JiaZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Ying PengZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Luotian LuState Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Yaxing SuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Jianwei LiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5931-9374
Qinghong LiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Zeming HuangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Yucheng WangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Fan QiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Dayong LiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xiaofei LvDepartment of Environmental Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-9587
Yan LiangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics, Key Laboratory for Agricultural Microbiome of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. yanliang@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1248-8563
Bin MaState Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. bma@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-4992

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (Key R&D plan of Zhejiang Province) 2024SSYS0104,2021C02064-7 and 2024ZD1000603| Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (China Postdoctoral Research Foundation) 2024M762854the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42090060,42277283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory burst oxidase homolog D (RBOHD)-dependent reactive oxygen species (ROS) in Arabidopsis are well known to suppress pathogen colonization, but their influence on beneficial microbes remains unclear. Here, we found that the beneficial rhizobacterium Pseudomonas anguilliseptica was significantly less enriched in the rhizosphere of rbohD mutants than in that of wild-type plants. Conversely, elevated rhizosphere ROS levels, either triggered by pretreatment with pathogenic Dickeya solani bacteria or caused by mutations in ROS scavenging genes (e.g., in apx1 and cat2 mutants), promoted the rhizosphere recruitment of P. anguilliseptica. This promoting effect was abolished by catalase treatment. In situ microfluidic chemotaxis assays further revealed that P. anguilliseptica exhibits a chemotactic response to low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide ( ≤ 500 nM), accompanied by upregulated expression of chemotaxis- and motility-related genes. Notably, inoculation of P. anguilliseptica effectively suppressed D. solani-induced disease symptoms, and this protective effect was attenuated by catalase treatment. Collectively, these findings reveal a previously unrecognized role of ROS in recruitment beneficial microbiota to enhance plant growth and suppress disease symptoms.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisPseudomonasReactive Oxygen SpeciesRhizosphereArabidopsis ProteinsCatalaseChemotaxisDickeyaHydrogen PeroxidePlant DiseasesPlant RootsSoil MicrobiologyArabidopsis ProteinsCatalaseHydrogen PeroxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesMicrobiomeMicrofluidic ChipPlant ImmunityRhizosphere ROS

Identifiers

PMID41514147
PMCPMC12909896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.