ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Quantifying surgical complexity: how smoothness metrics vary in robotic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards measuring the challenge: a narrative review on existing concepts and parallels for surgical struggle.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObjective performance indicators (OPIs) include measures of instrument movement during robotic procedures and can assess movement smoothness. This study analyzes smoothness metrics in cholecystectomy, hypothesizing that longer, more complex tasks exhibit reduced movement smoothness.
methodsCholecystectomy videos from our institution were analyzed, with Parkland grading used to assess cholecystitis severity. Since longer duration likely indicates greater complexity, cases were categorized as either complex or standard based on when the duration of a key operative step exceeded the surgeon's mean by at least one standard deviation - complex dissection (CD) vs standard dissection (SD). OPIs were evaluated for Calot triangle dissection (CTD) and liver bed dissection (LBD). Smoothness-related OPIs-including movement arrest period ratio (MAPR), spectral arc length (spalength), normalized speed (normspeed), speed peaks rate (SPR), and nondimensional jerk (nlognJerk)-were further classified based on arm function (e.g., dominant arm (DA) vs. active retraction (AR)).
resultsFifty-four videos were evaluated. Average step duration for CTD and LBD were 14.18 ± 9.87 and 10.05 ± 7.72 min, respectively. Case duration was correlated with Parkland grade (r = 0.26, p = 0.03). Parkland grade for CD was significantly higher than SD in CTD (2.7 vs 2.0, p < 0.03) but not in LBD. In both CTD and LBD, the smoothness profile for DA was affected differently than AR in CD. DA during CTD showed significant reductions in MAPR (0.78 vs 0.92), normspeed (0.24 vs 0.35), SPR (40.22 vs 65.63), nlognjerk (-37.96 vs -36.48) and spalength (-70,604.4 vs -35,742.5). However, significant changes were only seen for AR during CTD in SPR (11.73 vs 18.37), nlognjerk (-36.94 vs -35.23) and spalength (-119,126.5 vs -64,669.5) (all p < 0.05). Similar patterns were seen during LBD.
conclusionsSmoothness metrics seem to be affected by case difficulty and may be a marker for struggling and potentially used to determine when a surgeon needs help or guide case review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41514131What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.