ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Clofazimine Dry Powder in Healthy Mice.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clofazimine (CFZ), an old and highly lipophilic antimycobacterial drug, is a second-line agent for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and has demonstrated antitubercular efficacy when administered to the lung as different inhalation dry powder formulations. While its efficacy has been established, consensus has not been identified regarding the lung dose, pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, and biodistribution following inhalation. This study aimed to establish the biodistribution and inhaled PK of CFZ dry powder inhalation (DPI) formulation after single and multiple doses in healthy mice. Following a single low or high inhaled dose in healthy mice, lung concentrations of CFZ were ~ 20 folds higher than the corresponding plasma concentrations. Administering eight consecutive inhaled doses (twice weekly) maintained high and sustained lung concentrations (28 to 69 times higher than plasma concentrations), remaining significantly above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC: 0.6 - 2.0 μg/mL) of the free drug. Notably, CFZ concentrations in the lungs and plasma showed no discernable elimination phase up to four weeks post-dosing, with prolonged retention. Biodistribution studies indicated preferential CFZ retention in lung and spleen tissue following both single and multiple inhaled doses. In conclusion, these results suggest the novel dry powder inhaled CFZ formulation can produce high therapeutic concentration in lung tissues for extended periods of time after single and multiple doses, thereby, underscoring the potential of using inhaled CFZ as the treatment of MDR-TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41514126What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.