Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514102›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Implementing QbD for Nano-Pharmaceuticals and Complex Formulations to Achieve Predictable and High-Quality Outcomes.

Rohan Panwar, Anuradha Mishra, Abhisar Sahu, Syed Naved Quadri, M Z Abdin, Saman Fatima

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rohan PanwarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Sector 125, Noida, 201301, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3482-6723
Anuradha MishraDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Centre for Transgenic Plant Development, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2240-5160
Abhisar SahuDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Sector 125, Noida, 201301, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4569-8593
Syed Naved QuadriDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Centre for Transgenic Plant Development, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-6573
M Z AbdinDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Centre for Transgenic Plant Development, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India. mzabdin@jamiahamdard.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-0719
Saman FatimaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Sector 125, Noida, 201301, India. sfatima@amity.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9058-469X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are revolutionizing nanopharmaceutical development by enabling data-driven formulation design, process optimization, and prediction of biological performance. AI encompasses computational systems that mimic human cognitive functions, while ML utilizes large datasets to generate predictive models capable of managing complex pharmaceutical variables. Deep learning, a subset of ML, further refines this capability through multilayered neural networks that enhance decision-making and model precision. Integration of AI/ML into nanopharmaceutical research requires structured workflows encompassing data curation, cleaning, annotation verification, algorithm selection, and model validation to ensure reliability and reproducibility. In parallel, the pharmaceutical industry increasingly embraces the Quality by Design (QbD) framework to address raw material variability, limited process control, and incomplete understanding of critical formulation and process parameters. QbD provides a systematic, risk-based approach to embedding quality from the earliest development stages by defining Quality Target Product Profiles (QTPPs), identifying Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), and controlling Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) and Critical Process Parameters (CPPs). The convergence of AI/ML with QbD principles holds transformative potential for nanopharmaceuticals by enhancing predictive accuracy, minimizing experimental burden, and ensuring consistent, safe, and high-quality products. This review critically examines this integration, explores regulatory perspectives, and highlights current applications, challenges, and opportunities, offering a roadmap for efficient development, clinical translation, and commercialization of robust nanopharmaceutical formulations.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesArtificial IntelligenceChemistry, PharmaceuticalData AnalyticsDrug CompoundingDrug IndustryHumansMachine LearningNanotechnologyPharmaceutical PreparationsPredictive Learning ModelsQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsPharmaceutical PreparationsAI/MLDoENanopharmaceuticalsNanotechnologyQbD

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.