ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Implementing QbD for Nano-Pharmaceuticals and Complex Formulations to Achieve Predictable and High-Quality Outcomes.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocatalytic and biogenic pathways for sustainable nanoparticle synthesis: mechanisms, monitoring, and circular bioeconomy integration.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Review
- From Screening to Optimization: Strategic Implementation of Design of Experiments (DOE) for Robust Nanoparticle Formulation.Polymers · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and therapeutic potential of carbon nanodots for ocular disease.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Nanoencapsulated EO-based drug delivery for pest control: from chemistry to formulation design.Protoplasma · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are revolutionizing nanopharmaceutical development by enabling data-driven formulation design, process optimization, and prediction of biological performance. AI encompasses computational systems that mimic human cognitive functions, while ML utilizes large datasets to generate predictive models capable of managing complex pharmaceutical variables. Deep learning, a subset of ML, further refines this capability through multilayered neural networks that enhance decision-making and model precision. Integration of AI/ML into nanopharmaceutical research requires structured workflows encompassing data curation, cleaning, annotation verification, algorithm selection, and model validation to ensure reliability and reproducibility. In parallel, the pharmaceutical industry increasingly embraces the Quality by Design (QbD) framework to address raw material variability, limited process control, and incomplete understanding of critical formulation and process parameters. QbD provides a systematic, risk-based approach to embedding quality from the earliest development stages by defining Quality Target Product Profiles (QTPPs), identifying Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), and controlling Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) and Critical Process Parameters (CPPs). The convergence of AI/ML with QbD principles holds transformative potential for nanopharmaceuticals by enhancing predictive accuracy, minimizing experimental burden, and ensuring consistent, safe, and high-quality products. This review critically examines this integration, explores regulatory perspectives, and highlights current applications, challenges, and opportunities, offering a roadmap for efficient development, clinical translation, and commercialization of robust nanopharmaceutical formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41514102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.