Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514097›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026

Extracting geriatric syndromes from electronic health records: a scoping review.

C Squires, A Duignan, A Peterson, A H M Kilgour, T C Russ, S R Cox, S D Shenkin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C SquiresAgeing and Health Research Group, and Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, 5 Little France Rd, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK. charlotte.squires@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0527-4302
A DuignanNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
A PetersonNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8502-5183
A H M KilgourAgeing and Health Research Group, and Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, 5 Little France Rd, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-821X
T C RussAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9797-2188
S R CoxLothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-3642
S D ShenkinAgeing and Health Research Group, and Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, 5 Little France Rd, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-4776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeriatric syndromes are multifactorial ageing-related presentations. There is limited consensus regarding which presentations should be considered geriatric syndromes. Clinical codes generated following healthcare contacts are commonly used to identify diverse medical conditions. It is well demonstrated that geriatric syndromes are harder to identify using codes, possibly partly due to varying definitions, although identifying information is often located in unstructured text. Accurately identifying geriatric syndromes in healthcare records may therefore require different approaches compared to more firmly defined conditions. We review how studies using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and derived databases align or differ in terms of geriatric syndromes selected for study, and how the syndromes are identified in the data sources.

methodsThe review was registered on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/9ejhq ). Databases were searched in October 2024. Of 8086 titles screened, 74 studies had full text review, and 12 studies were included.

resultsTwelve studies from 7 countries identified 31 geriatric syndromes from primary databases (N = 6) or secondary databases (N = 6) using diagnostic codes, screening tools, or free text. The five most common geriatric syndromes were falls, functional decline, incontinence, delirium and malnutrition. Thirteen geriatric syndromes were included in two or more studies. Eight studies used more than one identification method. One study used two methods for all included syndromes. KEY

conclusionsThere is heterogeneity in what presentations studies include as geriatric syndromes, and how they identify them in EHRs. It is essential that researchers clearly describe their included geriatric syndromes, reason for selection, and identification methods.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGeriatric AssessmentGeriatricsAccidental FallsDeliriumHumansMalnutritionSyndromeUrinary IncontinenceClinical codingElectronic health recordsGeriatric syndromesMultifactorial

Identifiers

PMID41514097
PMCPMC13109117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.