Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514062›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2026

The mechanistic basis and cellular functions of UFMylation.

Masaaki Komatsu, Nobuo N Noda, Toshifumi Inada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating evidence for UFMylation client diversity.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. UFMylation of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Regulates Mitochondrial Metabolism.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masaaki KomatsuDepartment of Physiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. mkomatsu@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-7722
Nobuo N NodaInstitute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. nn@igm.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-8069
Toshifumi InadaDivision of RNA and Gene Regulation, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. toshiinada@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UFMylation is a ubiquitin-like post-translational modification that has a central role in ribosome-associated quality control at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER-RQC). Through a dedicated enzymatic cascade, UFM1 is conjugated to select substrates, notably the 60S ribosomal subunit protein RPL26, to maintain endoplasmic reticulum and ribosomal integrity under cellular stress. This Review focuses on the structural and mechanistic basis of UFMylation in ER-RQC and its contribution to proteostasis. Although recent studies have identified a growing number of putative UFM1-modified proteins across diverse cellular pathways, the physiological importance of many of these substrates remains unclear. We highlight both the emerging functional breadth of UFMylation and the need for caution in interpreting substrate relevance. UFMylation is increasingly linked to disease, including neurodevelopmental disorders and cancer, underscoring its biological importance. Together, these findings position UFMylation as a key regulatory system connecting endoplasmic reticulum function to broader stress responses.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic ReticulumProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsHumansProteinsProteostasisRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesUbiquitinUbiquitinationProteinsRibosomal ProteinsUbiquitinUFM1 protein, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.