Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514061›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Admixture Compatibility Studies in Parenteral Formulations: Packaging, Device, and Regulatory Perspectives.

Chetana Eknure, Vishvesh Joshi, Yogeshwar Bachhav

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chetana Eknure *Adex Pharma, Tilak Nagar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400089, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7093-5061
Vishvesh Joshi *Chartwell Pharmaceuticals LLC, 77 Brenner Dr, Congers, NY, 10920, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3744-1507
Yogeshwar BachhavAdex Pharma, Tilak Nagar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400089, India. ybachhav@adexpharma.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4197-3701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenteral therapies are vital in critical care, oncology, and nutrition, offering rapid onset, precise dosing, and high bioavailability. However, their safety is often compromised by admixture incompatibilities and drug-device interactions that threaten stability, efficacy, and patient outcomes. This review synthesizes the current scientific understanding of physicochemical and material-based incompatibilities in reconstituted formulations, intravenous drug admixtures, and parenteral nutrition, highlighting their implications for safety and efficacy. Key risks include precipitation, pH shifts, phase separation, leachables, particulates, and adsorption, with documented links to treatment failure, infusion reactions, and product recalls. Interactions with packaging systems-glass, plastics, elastomers, and siliconized components-are critically examined, alongside regulatory requirements for extractables, leachables, and container-closure integrity. Emerging strategies, such as advanced packaging materials, fluoropolymer-coated elastomers, and real-time monitoring technologies, are highlighted as pathways to safer parenteral therapy. By uniting clinical insights with regulatory requirements and emerging technologies, this review highlights admixture compatibility studies as essential to ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of parenteral drug delivery.

Indexed as

Drug PackagingChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsGlassHumansParenteral NutritionPharmaceutical PreparationsPlasticsPharmaceutical PreparationsPlasticsAdmixture compatibilityContainer-closure systemDrug-device interactionsParenteral formulationsRegulatory Compliance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.