ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
A survey of parental experiences and perceptions of NAVA in neonatal intensive care.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate parental perceptions and experiences of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in neonatal intensive care, focusing on understanding, comfort, and willingness to recommend its use. A survey of parents whose infants received NAVA or Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) NAVA at a tertiary NICU between January 2024 and July 2025. St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Fifty parents were invited; 32 returned completed surveys (response rate: 64%). Parent-reported understanding of ventilation modes, perceptions of infant comfort and willingness to recommend NAVA. Most respondents (81%, n = 26) felt staff explained different modes of breathing support clearly; 4 (13%) found explanations unclear, and 2 (6%) received none. Seventeen (53%) parents felt their baby was calmer and more settled during NAVA/NIV NAVA compared with other modes; 11 (34%) noticed no difference, and 4 (13%) perceived less comfort. The NAVA catheter scored a mean of 3.77/5 for comfort. Twenty-three (78%) stated they were "very likely" to recommend NAVA, 5 (16%) were "likely," 1 (6%) was "neutral," and 2 (12%) would not recommend it.Conclusion: Most parents reported positive perceptions of NAVA, with improved comfort compared with conventional modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.