ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Challenges in improving the equation for estimating 24-h urinary sodium excretion from casual urine in hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive drugs: addressing overestimation, especially at low sodium excretion levels.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The estimation formula by Tanaka et al. for predicting the 24-h urinary sodium (Na) excretion (24Na) from a single causal urine sample is widely used. However, it overestimates values in the low 24Na range. We aimed to develop a formula to improve the accuracy, particularly for samples with 24Na < 2 g/day. Stored data from 187 hypertensive patients (mean age, 66.1 years; 56.7% female) who underwent both 24-h home urine collection and a fasting morning causal urine test the following day were analyzed. We used a machine learning approach to extract conditional branches based on the threshold relationships among the variables. The proposed estimation formula was constructed by adding a correction term to the Na/Creatinine(Cr) ratio in Tanaka's formula and the modified formula was applied to each conditional branch. The correction terms included body mass index (BMI), age, and concentration of causal urine Na and were applied in different forms according to each branch. Compared with the Tanaka method, our method improved the agreement rate by ~25% and reduced the disagreement rate by 25% in samples with 24Na < 2 g/day. The correlation coefficient was higher (Ours: 0.51, Tanaka: 0.29), the range of error with 24Na was narrower (Ours: 4.89, Tanaka: 5.69), and the percentage of absolute errors for <1 g improved by 9.8%. Although developed from a specific dataset, our formula is useful for low-24Na samples prone to misestimation by the conventional formula and may improve the accuracy of dietary salt intake assessments from causal urine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41514025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.