Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41513944›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cryptic species Chrysoperla lucasina and C. carnea differ in predation of early Nezara viridula instars.

Raghavendra Reddy Manda, Radjeshry Raghoedat Panday, Alberto Pozzebon, Michael Rostás, Felix L Wäckers, Gerben J Messelink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raghavendra Reddy MandaBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture & Flower Bulbs, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 20, Bleiswijk, 2665 ZG, The Netherlands. raghavendrareddy.manda@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-2093
Radjeshry Raghoedat PandayBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture & Flower Bulbs, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 20, Bleiswijk, 2665 ZG, The Netherlands.
Alberto PozzebonDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals, and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Padua, 35020, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2445-7211
Michael RostásDivision of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstrasse 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-6513
Felix L WäckersDepartment of Research & Development, Biobest Group N. V, Ilse Velden 18, Westerlo, 2260, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-0615
Gerben J MesselinkBusiness Unit Greenhouse Horticulture & Flower Bulbs, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 20, Bleiswijk, 2665 ZG, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-1229

Funding

The Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security, and Nature and the Top Sector Horticulture & Starting Materials LWV24023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive pests increasingly threaten the stability of integrated pest management programs in greenhouse cropping systems, where biological control strategies are typically tailored to established pest complexes. Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) has emerged as a major pest in European greenhouses, where current biocontrol programs are poorly equipped to suppress it. Eight commercially available generalist arthropod predators commonly used in greenhouse solanaceous crops in Europe were assessed for their ability to suppress N. viridula. Their impact on its eggs and early nymphal instars was assessed through standardized laboratory assays, as well as greenhouse cage trials using fruit-bearing sweet pepper plants. Predation was observed mainly among larvae of Chrysoperla species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), with C. lucasina consistently outperforming C. carnea. Notably, C. lucasina was the only predator to attack N. viridula eggs, albeit at low levels. Against nymphal instars, third-instar C. lucasina larvae exhibited the highest predation, while second-instar C. lucasina often outperformed second-instar C. carnea and sometimes even matched the efficacy of third-instar C. carnea. All other predators showed little or no predation. In greenhouse cage trials, third-instar C. lucasina significantly reduced the survival of both first- and second-instar N. viridula nymphs under the structurally complex on-plant conditions. Across all assays, first-instar N. viridula nymphs were generally more vulnerable to predation than second-instar nymphs. These results identify C. lucasina as a promising candidate for augmentative biological control of N. viridula, warranting further evaluation under longer exposure periods, mixed-prey environments, and in combination with other biocontrol agents, such as egg parasitoids. Importantly, this study highlights how cryptic species within commercially used predators can differ markedly in efficacy, an underrecognized aspect of functional diversity in biological control.

Indexed as

HeteropteraHorticultureNeopteraPest Control, BiologicalPredatory BehaviorAnimalsIntroduced SpeciesLarvaNymphBiological controlChrysopidaeHemipteraIntegrated pest managementLacewingsStink bugs

Identifiers

PMID41513944
PMCPMC12865161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.