Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41513941›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development of a novel integrated RSM-Fuzzy MCDA framework for high-speed machinability assessment of WAAM-Fabricated aluminium.

S P Sundar Singh Sivam, Stalin Kesavan, A Johnson Santhosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S P Sundar Singh SivamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603203, Tamil Nadu, India. legendsundar2k6@gmail.com.
Stalin KesavanDepartment of Marine Engineering, Amet University, East Coast Road, Chennai, 603 112, Kanathur, India.
A Johnson SanthoshFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. johnson.antony@ju.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the high-speed machining process of WAAM-fabricated aluminum, focusing on enhancing machinability indicators while aligning with sustainable manufacturing practices. A novel hybrid optimization framework combining Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Fuzzy Logarithmic Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW), and Fuzzy WASPAS was developed to optimize parameters such as surface finish, material removal rate, cutting force, and power consumption. The optimization model identified optimal machining parameters (8000 RPM cutting speed, 0.1 mm/tooth feed rate, 1 mm depth of cut, and a four-flute tool), achieving a surface roughness (Ra) of 0.35 microns, material removal rate (MRR) of 38.4 mm³/min, cutting force (Fc) of 114 N, and power consumption (Pc) of 312 W. Validation tests confirmed the accuracy of the predicted results. The study focuses on specific machining conditions and tool configurations. Future research could explore different tool materials and machining environments to further enhance the model’s applicability. The findings provide insights that can help industry practitioners optimize machining processes, improve efficiency, and contribute to sustainable manufacturing aligned with SDGs. This research introduces a novel hybrid optimization methodology combining RSM, Fuzzy LMAW, and Fuzzy WASPAS, contributing to both scientific understanding and industrial practices in sustainable machining.

Indexed as

AluminumFuzzy LMAWFuzzy WASPASHigh-speed machiningProcess optimizationRSMSDGsSustainable manufacturingWAAM

Identifiers

PMID41513941
PMCPMC12865189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.