ArticleScientific reports2026
Real-time wearable biomechanics framework for sports injury prevention and rehabilitation optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive accuracy of machine learning and markerless gait analysis for return-to-sport following lower extremity injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
- Acute and Short-Term Effects of Real-Time Feedback Neuromuscular Training on Vertical Jump Performance and Reactive Efficiency in Youth Basketball Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Sensor-Based Sport Performance and Health Monitoring: A Review of Wearable, Vision-Based, and Multimodal Sensing Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Strategic Management of Design and Conceptualization Factors for Wearable Postural Rehabilitation Devices: A Causal Interdependency Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital Twins in Orthopedics and Trauma: Concepts, Emerging Evidence, and Barriers to Clinical Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and sports genomics: advancing precision sports science and athletic performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sports and activity-related musculoskeletal injuries are a major cause of long-term disability, underscoring the need for proactive detection and data-driven rehabilitation strategies. Recent advancements in wearable sensing enable continuous, non-invasive biomechanical monitoring for early risk identification and recovery optimization. This study presents a real-time wearable biomechanics framework integrating inertial measurement units (IMUs) and surface electromyography (sEMG) for injury-risk assessment and rehabilitation tracking. Field experiments were conducted with 50 athletes at Dring Stadium, Bahawalpur. The IMUs were positioned on the knee, hip, and shoulder joints, while sEMG electrodes measured biceps, triceps, and quadriceps muscle activations. Recorded joint-angle ranges averaged 125° (knee during running), 110° (knee during jumping), and 90° (shoulder during lifting); corresponding mean muscle forces were 150 N (quadriceps), 170 N (hamstrings), and 230 N (deltoid). A multi-stage optimization algorithm minimized prediction errors by jointly tuning sensor calibration and computational latency. The hybrid IMU–sEMG model achieved 92.3% accuracy, 90.5% recall, and an AUC of 0.93 for injury-risk classification, with an average real-time feedback latency of 188 ± 15 ms. Early detection of joint-angle asymmetry (> 10°) and muscle-force imbalance (> 15%) accurately predicted emerging anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and muscle-strain risks. Real-time monitoring guided individualized rehabilitation loads and progressive recovery milestones. By combining wearable sensing, physics-informed biomechanical modeling, and adaptive machine-learning optimization, the proposed system delivers a quantitatively validated, reproducible, and scalable framework for injury prevention and rehabilitation. Supporting UN Sustainable Development Goal 3, this work advances musculoskeletal health monitoring through validated sensor integration and empirically tested AI models, offering measurable benefits across athletic and occupational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.