ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
The role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in differentiating gouty arthritis from rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) for distinguishing between gouty arthritis (GA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by comparing their sonographic features.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 100 patients with a confirmed diagnosis (50 with rheumatoid arthritis, RA; 50 with gouty arthritis, GA from Chengdu Rheumatism Hospital between February and August 2025). The MSUS features compared between the two groups included indicators of crystal deposition (e.g., double-track sign, tophi, punctate hyperechoic foci) and indicators of inflammation (e.g., synovitis, tenosynovitis, tendinitis). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for each sonographic feature.
resultsUrate crystal deposition demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for GA (sensitivity 98.0%, specificity 100.0%, AUC = 0.990). Tophi and punctate hyperechoic foci also showed high specificity (98.0% each). In the RA group, tendinitis was the most frequent finding (sensitivity 96.0%, specificity 68.0%, AUC = 0.820). A diagnostic model combining GA-specific features achieved superior accuracy (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98%, AUC = 0.990). Correlation analysis revealed a significant association between the presence of tophi and disease duration in GA patients (r = 0.349, P = 0.013), but no such correlations were found in the RA group.
conclusionMSUS provides high diagnostic value for GA by reliably detecting characteristic crystal-related features, particularly urate crystal deposition. For RA, MSUS is highly sensitive in detecting inflammatory and structural lesions such as tendinitis, tenosynovitis, and bone erosions; however, these features alone show limited specificity for differentiating RA from GA. Key Points • Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) demonstrates exceptional diagnostic value for gouty arthritis (GA), with the detection of urate crystal deposition showing near-perfect accuracy (sensitivity 98.0%, specificity 100.0%, AUC=0.990). • A diagnostic model combining characteristic GA features (urate deposition, tophi, and punctate hyperechoic foci) achieved superior performance (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98%, AUC=0.990), outperforming any single sonographic feature. • The presence of sonographic tophi was significantly correlated with longer disease duration in GA patients, underscoring its role as a marker of chronic disease burden. • While MSUS is highly sensitive for detecting inflammatory lesions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), such as tendinitis and tenosynovitis, these features lack specificity for differentiating RA from GA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41513922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.