ArticleScientific reports2026
Robotic trunk perturbation magnitude affects standing postural responses in individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury receiving epidural stimulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After a severe spinal cord injury (SCI), the human spinal circuitry receiving epidural stimulation can generate lower limb postural responses to sensory inputs associated with trunk perturbation. Here, we assessed the effects of different trunk perturbative forces on standing postural responses in six individuals with chronic, motor complete SCI receiving epidural stimulation to facilitate standing. The robotic upright stand trainer (RobUST) provided constant assistance for pelvic control and delivered precise trunk perturbations with different magnitudes (10 ± 4%BodyWeight (BW) -Low, 14 ± 4%BW -Mid, and 18 ± 4%BW -High) and directions (left, right, front, back). Trunk excursion, ground reaction forces (GRF), and electromyography (EMG) amplitude were assessed. Perturbation magnitude significantly affected trunk excursion and GRFs in all tested directions (p ≤ 0.002), with larger modulations elicited by higher perturbation magnitudes. Lower limb EMG amplitude responses were less consistent. In some instances, perturbation magnitude did not affect EMG amplitude. In others, high-magnitude perturbations promoted larger EMG amplitude modulation compared to weaker perturbations, resulting in higher or lower levels of activation depending on muscle and direction. These findings contribute to characterize the residual postural control potential of the human spinal circuitry below the level of SCI, which should be considered when defining postural training protocols with spinal cord neuromodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.