Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41513870›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Speech onset time at home or in the lab: The role of testing environment and experimenter presence.

Giorgio Piazza, Natalia Kartushina, Christoforos Souganidis, James E Flege, Clara D Martin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giorgio PiazzaBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. giorgio.piazza@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-4499
Natalia KartushinaInstitute of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Niels Henrik Abels veg 36, 0373, Oslo, Norway.
Christoforos SouganidisHiTZ Basque Center for Language Technology, Aholab Signal Processing Laboratory, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain.
James E FlegeUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Clara D MartinBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación Severo Ochoa CEX2020-001010-SBasque Excellence Research Centers 2022-2025H2020 European Research Council 819093'la Caixa' Foundation ID 100010434'la Caixa' Foundation LCF/BQ/DI19/11730045Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad PID2020- 113926GB-100Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad PID2023- 148756NB-I00Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca 2022FT8HNC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psycholinguistic research has become increasingly reliant on online experimentation, making it an attractive approach for studying speech production. However, concerns remain about data quality and participant engagement in online settings. In this preregistered study, we used two tasks-picture naming and reading aloud-to test whether the lexical frequency effect (low-frequency words having shorter speech onset times than high-frequency words) could be reliably detected in the online environment (run at home), both with and without experimenter supervision. Participants completed the same two tasks at home and in the lab. Half of the participants performed both tasks with supervision and the other half unsupervised. In the naming task, all conditions yielded consistent frequency effects (~27-41 ms), comparable to previous online and lab findings. In the reading aloud task, lexical frequency effect emerged in all conditions except for the home-supervised, where the effect was in the expected direction but nonsignificant (~12 ms). Notably, participants were overall faster at home than in the lab (~10 ms), and unsupervised settings yielded the largest effect sizes. This suggests that experimenter presence may inadvertently dampen subtle effects, possibly due to increased self-monitoring or reduced comfort. Such findings indicate the reliability of online platforms for speech production research in psycholinguistics and highlight the nuanced influence of supervision on speech outcomes.

Indexed as

PsycholinguisticsSpeechAdultFemaleHumansMaleReadingYoung AdultOnline Psycholinguistic ExperimentsRemote Data CollectionPsycholinguistic MethodsSpeech Onset LatencySpeech Production

Identifiers

PMID41513870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.