ArticleScientific reports2026
AI and big data personalized training protocol for Chinese youth basketball.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Youth basketball talent development in China faces multiple challenges-homogeneous training methods, insufficient attention to individual differences, and a lack of systematic, evidence-based decision-making. This study protocol describes the design and planned validation of an AI- and big-data-driven personalized training system aimed at testing whether integrated multidimensional data and dynamic feedback can improve talent identification and training outcomes in Chinese youth basketball. The protocol outlines the randomized effectiveness trial, process evaluation, and implementation measures that will be used to evaluate feasibility, potential efficacy, and adoption. A mixed-methods, randomized controlled pretest-posttest design will be implemented. One hundred youth basketball athletes aged 12-18 will be recruited and randomized (1:1) to an AI-driven personalized training (experimental) arm or a conventional training (control) arm. Multidimensional data (physical, technical, training-load, psychological, and game statistics) will be collected using validated field tests, wearable devices, video analysis, and standardized questionnaires. Primary quantitative analyses will compare pre-post changes between groups using intention-to-treat principles. The primary inferential approach will use ANCOVA (adjusting for baseline score, age stratum, sex, and team clustering) and linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures; effect sizes (Cohen's d) and 95% CIs will be reported. Advanced methods (Bayesian regression, SEM) and predictive ML models will be treated as exploratory pending sample size adequacy and diagnostic checks. Qualitative interviews with coaches and participants will explore acceptability and implementation barriers guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This study is anticipated to meet the criteria for exemption under Article 32 of the 2023 Ethical and Moral Management Measures; nevertheless, the full protocol and participant-facing materials will be submitted to the institutional Ethics Review Committee for formal confirmation (or exemption letter) and any correspondence will be archived. Study findings will be disseminated for academic, non-commercial purposes subject to ethical approvals.Trial registration To be registered prior to trial commencement. Registry name and registration number will be provided in the final manuscript (e.g., Chinese Clinical Trial Registry or ClinicalTrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.