Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41513759›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

GIS-based assessment of land degradation vulnerability and environmental indices as ecological indicators in Western Agro-climatic zone of Tamil Nadu, India.

S Kaliraj, R J Jerin Joe, V Stephen Pitchaimani, S Richard Abishek, Shankar Karuppannan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S KalirajNational Centre for Earth Science Studies (NCESS), Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695011, India.
R J Jerin JoePG and Research Department of Geology, V.O. Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, 628008, India.
V Stephen PitchaimaniPG and Research Department of Geology, V.O. Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, 628008, India. stephen.geo@voccollege.ac.in.
S Richard AbishekNational Centre for Earth Science Studies (NCESS), Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695011, India.
Shankar KaruppannanDepartment of Applied Geology, College of Applied Natural Science, Adama Science and Technology University, P.O. Box: 1888, Adama, Ethiopia. geoshankar1984@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5014-7885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land degradation is a critical global issue that affects soil fertility, food production, and biomass, driven by climate change and human activities. This study evaluates land degradation (LD) vulnerability across various land use and land cover (LULC) types in the Western Agroclimatic Zone of Theni district, Tamil Nadu, India. The GIS-based land degradation vulnerability index (LDVI) is calculated to identify site-specific degradation rates by combining four indicators (QI): Soil Quality Index (SQI), Climate Quality Index (CQI), Vegetation Quality Index (VQI), and Land Management Quality Index (MQI), derived from various geo-environmental and climatic variables. The LDVI map classifies the area into four categories: (i) non- affected zones (N), (ii) potential vegetative cover (P) with LDVI < 1. 22, (iii) fragile zones (F 1, F 2, and F 3) with LDVI values from 1. 23 to 1. 1.37, and (iv) critical zones (C 1 and C 2) with LDVI values between 1. 38 and 1. 53. A critical zone (C 3) with LDVI > 1.53. 53 indicates a severe land degradation risk, covering 3.68% of the total area. About 25. Approximately 38% of the region is affected by severe land degradation, primarily on pediplains, barrens, and fallows, resulting from soil erosion, salinity intrusion, nutrient loss, and inadequate land management. Meanwhile, 44. 38% falls within fragile categories, primarily on alluvial plains with red loamy soils. Conversely, 26. 3% of the area is classified as lower risk zones, such as forests, plantations, and irrigated lands, which benefit from soil fertility retention and effective management. The geographic correlation analysis reveals a strong positive relationship with VQI and MQI, with ‘r’ values of 0.835 and 0.831, respectively, indicating a risk to cultivable lands. Significantly, Pearson’s correlation confirms a strong positive relationship between LDVI and SQI and VQI, with coefficient values of 0.99 and 0.84, respectively, indicating that changes in soil properties and vegetation (NDVI) have a direct influence on land degradation across various regions. These findings provide a site-specific land degradation rate and its spatial relationship to quality indicators, emphasizing the importance of land-water-soil management for mitigation. Although the LDVI map reveals a spatial pattern of land degradation at a 30 m x 30 m pixel scale, limited by the resolution and temporal scale of the input datasets, future work could improve the LDVI by incorporating higher-resolution input data and field observations. This research directly supports UN-SDG 2 - Zero Hunger (sustainable agriculture and food security), and SDG 13 - Climate Action (climate resilience and adaptation).

Indexed as

Agro climatic zoneGIS techniquesLand degradationLDVI modelMultiparametric analysisQuality indicatorsRemote sensingSouthern india

Identifiers

PMID41513759
PMCPMC12877193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.