ArticleScientific reports2026
Tracking evolving communities in fake news cascades using temporal graphs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Opetitive Bridging Structure in Rumor Cascades: A Multilayer Overlapping Community Approach with Information-Theoretic Characterization.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SFPathFormer for spatial frequency robot navigation and obstacle avoidance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misinformation proliferates on social media platforms owing to both static and dynamic user populations, where the set of active users and their interactions evolve over time. The development, amalgamation, or disintegration of communities throughout an information cascade complicates the longitudinal tracking of these communities. Numerous contemporary methodologies either neglect temporal factors or employ static clustering techniques, which do not accommodate dynamic coordination. We propose TIDE-MARK, a methodology designed to identify communities inside fake news cascades that exhibit consistency in both structure and temporal dynamics. The methodology encompasses node embeddings via temporal graph neural networks, prototype-driven clustering, Markov modeling of community transitions, and reinforcement-based refinement. The unified design facilitates consistent and comprehensible community trajectories. Three empirical datasets pertaining to political, entertainment, and health-related fake news are utilized to evaluate TIDE-MARK. The databases include PolitiFact, GossipCop, and ReCOVery. Our model surpasses robust baselines regarding structural (modularity, conductance) and temporal (adjusted Rand index) measures, supported by consistent effect sizes. Structural research indicates that real news spreads through more scattered and less organized communities, while false news propagates through more stable and well interconnected communities. Our objective is to assess the viability of interventions by simulating a structure-aware approach that targets important users in nascent communities. The substantial reduction in cascade modularity and spread demonstrated in the results demonstrates the potential viability of content-neutral mitigation techniques. TIDE-MARK offers a structure-aware framework for real-time fake news monitoring, emphasizing network-based strategy signals over textual analysis. It establishes a foundation for innovative methods of dynamic community monitoring inside complex social systems and features an interpretable architecture that enables ethical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.