ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation and validation of a revised VetCompass clinical grading tool for heat-related illness in dogs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'Teleonomes in Tatters': The Welfare Costs of Selecting Dogs for Extreme Phenotypes, and the Case for Change.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The original VetCompass clinical grading tool for heat-related illness (HRI) in dogs was developed using general primary-care clinical records. Using two novel HRI emergency-care datasets from Vets Now clinics during 2022 and 2023, this current study aimed to firstly evaluate and revise the original tool, then to validate the revised tool. Evaluation of the original grading tool using 364 HRI cases treated during 2022 prompted three revisions; dyspnoea moved from Mild to Moderate grades, episodic collapse from Moderate to Mild, and new critical temperature criteria (≥ 41.0 °C) were added to both Moderate and Severe categories. The revised grading tool was then validated using 422 HRI cases treated during 2023, using univariable logistic regression to evaluate the HRI grades as risk factors for death. The revised tool was deemed to show improved discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC): 0.79, 95% CI 0.74–0.84) for predicting a fatal HRI outcome compared to the original tool (AUROC: 0.72, 95% CI 0.66–0.78). This study provides an example of ongoing evaluation and validation that could be applied to other veterinary clinical tools. The revised and validated VetCompass HRI grading tool (2026) should facilitate improved veterinary triage and contextualised care discussions for dogs with HRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.