Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41513723›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluation and validation of a revised VetCompass clinical grading tool for heat-related illness in dogs.

Sian Beard, Emily J Hall, Jude Bradbury, Anne J Carter, Sophie Gilbert, Lucy Leicester, Dom Barfield, Dan G O'Neill

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sian BeardPathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Herts, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7586-4702
Emily J HallDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Herts, UK. emilyhall@rvc.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-8736
Jude BradburyDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Herts, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5210-9524
Anne J CarterFoods Connected, Old City Factory, 100 Patrick St, Londonderry, BT48 7EL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6216-2377
Sophie GilbertVets Now, Penguin House, Castle Riggs, Dunfermline, KY11 8SG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1610-642X
Lucy LeicesterVets Now, Penguin House, Castle Riggs, Dunfermline, KY11 8SG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-7835
Dom BarfieldDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Herts, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-2781
Dan G O'NeillPathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Herts, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1115-2723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The original VetCompass clinical grading tool for heat-related illness (HRI) in dogs was developed using general primary-care clinical records. Using two novel HRI emergency-care datasets from Vets Now clinics during 2022 and 2023, this current study aimed to firstly evaluate and revise the original tool, then to validate the revised tool. Evaluation of the original grading tool using 364 HRI cases treated during 2022 prompted three revisions; dyspnoea moved from Mild to Moderate grades, episodic collapse from Moderate to Mild, and new critical temperature criteria (≥ 41.0 °C) were added to both Moderate and Severe categories. The revised grading tool was then validated using 422 HRI cases treated during 2023, using univariable logistic regression to evaluate the HRI grades as risk factors for death. The revised tool was deemed to show improved discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC): 0.79, 95% CI 0.74–0.84) for predicting a fatal HRI outcome compared to the original tool (AUROC: 0.72, 95% CI 0.66–0.78). This study provides an example of ongoing evaluation and validation that could be applied to other veterinary clinical tools. The revised and validated VetCompass HRI grading tool (2026) should facilitate improved veterinary triage and contextualised care discussions for dogs with HRI.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesHeat Stress DisordersAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleRisk FactorsROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexCanine heat-related illnessCanine heatstrokeClinical grading toolHRIValidationVetCompass

Identifiers

PMID41513723
PMCPMC12868809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.