ArticleScientific reports2026
Analysis of dynamic splitting failure characteristics of silica fume reinforced polypropylene fiber concrete based on DIC.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the impact resistance of polypropylene fiber content in silica fume-reinforced polypropylene fiber concrete, a dynamic splitting experiment was conducted using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) device. The dynamic tensile strength of the specimens under varying impact pressures was examined. The evolution of strain characteristics and crack formation on the specimen surface was analyzed using Digital Image Correlation (DIC), while the fractal nature of the specimen fragments was assessed through screening. The results indicate that the stress-time history curve fluctuations in concrete with varying fiber sizes are more pronounced compared to concrete with a single fiber type. The latter half of the control group’s curve, which lacks fiber, exhibits a smooth, nearly fluctuation-free profile. The dynamic tensile strength of coarse polypropylene fiber-reinforced concrete is higher than that of fine polypropylene fiber, with increases of 7.6% and 11.3% under high impact pressure, and 7.9% and 30.8% under quasi-static conditions, respectively. As the impact progresses, the primary crack propagates from the high-strain region along the loading direction through the center of the specimen, followed by the gradual expansion or connection of secondary cracks with the main crack. The fragmentation of the specimen exhibits a degree of self-similarity. The mass ratio of fragments with particle sizes smaller than 20 mm increases, accompanied by a gradual increase in the fractal dimension. The crack opening speed of the specimen reinforced with polypropylene fibers was reduced by 45.3%, demonstrating that the polypropylene fibers significantly inhibited the macroscopic propagation of cracks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.