ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid deep learning and RSM modeling of diesel engine performance using TiO
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrogen-assisted nannochloropsis sp. microalgae biodiesel to operate cleaner diesel engines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the performance and emission features of a single-cylinder diesel engine fuelled with waste plastic oil (WPO) blended with diesel, 1-butanol, and TiO2 nanoparticles. Novelty lies in the synergistic doping of TiO2 nanoparticles with 1-butanol, which enhances durability, fuel efficiency, and emission reduction compared to conventional diesel. Test blends include 90D7PO3B + 25ppmTiO2, 85D10PO5B + 50ppmTiO2, 80D13PO7B + 75ppmTiO2, 100PO + 100ppmTiO2, and neat diesel (100D). The blend 80D13PO7B + 75ppmTiO2 achieved the highest brake thermal efficiency (37.3%) and the lowest brake-specific fuel consumption (0.22 kg/kWh), while 85D10PO5B + 50ppmTiO2 recorded the maximum cylinder pressure (72 bar). Hydrocarbon and CO emissions were minimized with 100PO + 100ppmTiO2 (50 ppm, 0.035% respectively), whereas CO2 and NOx emissions were lowest for 80D13PO7B + 75ppmTiO2 (8% and 1800 ppm). To further explore and optimize multi-factor effects, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was combined with deep machine learning models. RSM constructed quadratic surrogates, validated using ANOVA, revealing nonlinear curvature effects across responses. Multi-objective optimization identified an operating point at IMEP 7.7 bar and LCV 42,597 kJ/kg, yielding BTE 35.26%, BSFC 0.22 kg/kWh, CO 0.018%, HC 40.54 ppm, CO2 5.89%, and NOx 1345 ppm, confirming the classical efficiency NOx trade-off. Predictive modelling using Bayesian neural networks (BNN) and linear regression demonstrated that BNN consistently outperformed LR, achieving higher R2, lower MSE, and tighter residual alignment across all responses. The integration of TiO2–1-butanol doping with advanced predictive optimization demonstrates a viable alternative fuel pathway, delivering improved performance, reduced emissions, and statistically validated machine learning–RSM frameworks for future engine research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.