ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine for influenza management: a cross-sectional study from Palestine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) are commonly used worldwide to prevent and manage common colds and influenza-like illnesses, but data on their use specifically for influenza among adults in Palestine are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CAM use among Palestinians for flu management, to identify commonly used CAM products, and the sources promoting them during flu season, and to explore the reasons for their use. A cross-sectional survey was carried out among adults aged 18 years and older. The questionnaire covered socio-demographic variables, clinical characteristics, health status, types and frequency of CAM used, patients' sources of information, causes of their usage, attitudes, and beliefs. The data analysis included descriptive and regression analyses to explore the connections between patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and CAM usage. All analyses were conducted using R software. Among 363 participants, 34(9.4%) got the flu vaccine, and 274 (75%) used at least one method of CAM for managing influenza. The majority of participants 239 (65%) used at least one herb for flu management, with Sage being the most commonly reported herb 162(44.8%), followed by chamomile (40.9%) and anise 144(39.8%). Vitamin D was the most widely used biologically-based therapy for flu management (31.8%). Additionally, 230 (63.4%) used CAM to enhance their immune system. Participants primarily obtained information about CAM from friends and family (247, 67.7%) and the Internet (233, 64.2%). Moreover, 203 (56%) perceived the effectiveness of CAM compared to conventional medicine to vary depending on the specific health condition or situation. In multivariable analysis, participants who preferred pharmaceutical drugs (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17-0.73, p = 0.005) and those who used neither CAM nor pharmaceutical drugs (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.44, p < 0.001) were significantly less likely to report CAM use compared with those who reported using both. CAM was commonly used to prevent and treat flu in Palestine. Understanding the degree to which people of Palestine rely on CAM products as a remedy for treatment and/or prevention of influenza is critical for the public, researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. The study's results underscore important public health implications, including the need for evidence-based education on the safe use of CAM and awareness of potential herb-drug interactions. Developing clear guidance for integrating CAM safely into influenza management alongside routine medical care may support better health outcomes and inform national health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.