ArticleScientific reports2026
A cross-sectional study of screened depression prevalence among Gaza war survivors who fled versus those who remained.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Child health in Gaza: what can children expect?BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Review
- Exploring anxiety as a potential mediator of the association between home destruction and PTSD symptoms among hemodialysis patients in Gaza after 7th Oct 2023.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Pain catastrophizing as a mediator of the relationship between pain intensity and depression: Evidence from chronic pain patients in Gaza.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating conflict in Gaza since October 2023 has caused an unprecedented humanitarian crisis, widespread destruction, and mass displacement, profoundly impacting mental health. While depression is prevalent in war-affected regions, Gaza shows exceptionally high rates, with some studies reporting up to 99.5% prevalence. Crucially, comparative studies directly examining depression prevalence between Gaza war survivors who remained and those who fled have been notably absent. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare screened depression prevalence among Gaza war survivors, specifically differentiating between those who remained within Gaza and those who fled to outside Palestine, and to assess associated sociodemographic and war-related factors. Data were collected from 788 adult Palestinian participants, including 383 individuals who fled Palestine and 405 who remained in Gaza. Depression symptoms were assessed using the online self-administered Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Depression severity levels were classified according to standard cut-off scores, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with depression. An alarmingly high overall prevalence of moderate-to-severe depression (82%) was found, with 37% experiencing severe depression. The fled group exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of moderate-to-severe depression (90.86%) compared to the non-fled group (72.59%), with nearly half (49.87%) of the fled group suffering from severe depression. Logistic regression analysis revealed that being in the fledgling group, younger age, and losing a family member significantly increased the odds of moderate-to-severe depression. Over 20% of respondents reported suicidal ideation nearly every day. Risk factors for depression appeared to operate similarly across both populations. This study highlights an exceptionally high prevalence of depression among Gaza war survivors, with those who fled experiencing significantly greater severity. The findings underscore the profound psychological burden of forced displacement and emphasize the urgent need for comprehensive, long-term mental health support for all war survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.