ArticleScientific reports2026
A cost-effective image-based machine learning framework for automating active iron estimation in Peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) Leaves.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron (Fe) deficiency significantly affects the quality of peaches in temperate zones. Conventional iron assessment methods, such as laboratory analysis, are time- and resource- consuming. This study presents an image-based diagnostic tool for rapid estimation of the iron status in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) orchards. Therefore, a dataset of 1000 peach leaves from 200 trees across 65 orchards was collected and photographed. The leaves were then labeled based on the active iron (Fe2+) concentration, as determined by the orthophenanthroline extraction and atomic absorption spectrometry in the laboratory. Thirty-six different features were extracted from the images and analyzed using linear regression and neural network models. Subsequently, the most relevant features were identified by stepwise linear regression and sensitivity analysis to refine the models. The optimal linear model, incorporating blue difference chroma (Cb), lightness (L), green-minus-red (GMR), and normalized red index (NRI), achieved an [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]. The neural network model, with selected features showed slightly better accuracy ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]) compared to the linear model. The results indicate the potential of this method as an in-situ alternative to laboratory analysis for estimating active iron in peach leaves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.