Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41513684›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Global change factors differ in effect when acting alone and in a multi-factor background.

Rebecca Rongstock, Huiying Li, Anika Lehmann, Anja Wulf, Matthias C Rillig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca Rongstock *Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Berlin, Germany.
Huiying Li *Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Berlin, Germany.
Anika LehmannFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-9297
Anja WulfFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias C RilligFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Berlin, Germany. rillig@zedat.fu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-7853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of multiple global change factors affects most ecosystems. Urban soils face stressors like heat, drought, road salt, nitrogen deposition, surfactants, and microplastics. Given that combined factors of global change have shown unpredictable effects, we here ask which individual factors have particularly negative effects in multifactorial contexts. We explore this through a subtractive design, comparing single-factor treatments (addition) to treatments where a specific factor is removed (subtraction). The results vary from predominantly negative, positive, to mixed effects. However, removing these factors from a multi-factor context generally improves soil properties and biological processes. Resource related factors enhance microbial activity individually but show no such benefit in multi-factor scenarios. Our findings highlight that the combined effects of factors often differ from their individual impacts. In restoration, priority should be given to mitigating factors with the strongest negative influence in multi-stressor contexts, rather than targeting those with significant isolated effects.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemSoilDroughtsSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID41513684
PMCPMC12796432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.