ArticleNature communications2026
sCellST predicts single-cell gene expression from H& E images.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in carcinoma: navigating phenotypic states to target resistance and metastasis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Histopathology-centered computational evolution of spatial omics: integration, mapping, and foundation models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Inflammation-Driven Lymphoid Structures: Organization, Function, and Clinical Impact Across Autoimmunity, Cancer, and Checkpoint Toxicity.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the spatial organization of individual cell types within tissue and how this organization is disrupted in disease, is a central question in biology and medicine. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides are widely available and provide detailed morphological context, while spatial gene expression profiling offers complementary molecular insights, though it remains costly and limited in accessibility. Predicting gene expression directly from histological images is therefore an attractive goal. However, existing approaches typically rely on small image patches, limiting resolution and the ability to capture fine-grained morphological variation. Here, we introduce a deep learning approach that predicts single-cell gene expression from morphology, matching patch-based methods on spot level prediction tasks. The model recovers biologically meaningful expression patterns across two cancer datasets and distinguishes fine cell populations. This approach enables molecular-level interpretation of standard histological slides at scale, offering new opportunities to study tissue organization and cellular diversity in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.