ArticleBMJ global health2026
Acceptability of ambulance-based telemedicine (ABT) for paediatric emergencies in Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGlobally, half of all 6.2 million deaths in children are caused by acute illnesses which can be prevented if diagnosed and treated in time. We hypothesise that long elapsed travel time and delay in care can be tackled using telemedicine. The objective of this study is to determine the acceptability of linking ambulances that transport acutely ill children to a remote paediatric emergency physician using a simple audiovisual device.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study to determine the acceptability of ambulance-based teleconsultation for the emergency care of acutely ill children informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. We developed semistructured guides using this framework and conducted five interviews with telemedicine physicians (TMPs), 18 interviews with parents of children who recently needed an ambulance and four focused groups with emergency medical technicians (EMTs) who transport children.
resultsAll participants were supportive of using the telemedicine consultation during ambulance transport in the proposed trial as they felt that having access to a video-based physician would offer prompt intervention, particularly for critically ill children in crowded cities and remote regions with scarce resources. Parents believed that ambulance-based telemedicine would enhance their trust in EMTs and reduce their stress. The concerns related to the intervention included parental reluctance in using video cameras due to privacy issues, doubts about doctors' treatment reliability, risk of miscommunication and inadequate parental education. To address these challenges, the groups proposed solutions such as joint training for EMTs and TMPs, educating parents about intervention processes, improving telecommunication infrastructure and promoting public awareness.
conclusionParents, EMTs and TMPs mutually agreed that the use of telemedicine during ambulance transport can be successfully implemented through proper training and is acceptable in our population. All participants agreed that this intervention holds great potential to improve the survival of critically ill children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.