Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41512959›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer policy2026

Accelerating cancer treatment optimisation: A multistakeholder roadmap from the Cancer Medicines Forum.

Denis Lacombe, Fábio Cardoso Borges, Ana E Amariutei, Christopher M Booth, Guy Brusselle, Raffaella Casolino, Pierre Demolis, Rosa Giuliani, Daniel A Goldstein, Gwenaelle Gravis and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Denis LacombeEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: denis.lacombe@eortc.org.
Fábio Cardoso BorgesEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium; Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: fabio.borges@eortc.org.
Ana E AmariuteiEuropean Patient Advocacy Institute, Riemerling, Germany. Electronic address: ana.amariutei@gmail.com.
Christopher M BoothDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: Christopher.Booth@kingstonhsc.ca.
Guy BrusselleDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: Guy.Brusselle@uzgent.be.
Raffaella CasolinoDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, Rehabilitation and Disability, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: casolinor@who.int.
Pierre DemolisEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Icelandic Medicines Agency, Reykjavík, Iceland. Electronic address: pierre.d.demolis@lyfjastofnun.is.
Rosa GiulianiGuy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rosagiuliani@gmail.com.
Daniel A GoldsteinCenter for Cancer Economics, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. Electronic address: danielg3@tauex.tau.ac.il.
Gwenaelle GravisInstitut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, CNRS, CRCM, Immunity and Cancer Team, Marseille, France. Electronic address: gravisg@ipc.unicancer.fr.
Martin KaiserEuropean Haematology Association, The Hague, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Martin.Kaiser@icr.ac.uk.
Iphigenie KorakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: korakis.iphigenie@iuct-oncopole.fr.
Momir RadulovicAgency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubliana, Slovenia. Electronic address: Momir.Radulovic@jazmp.si.
Richard SullivanKing's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: richard.sullivan@kcl.ac.uk.
Bertrand TombalDivision of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: bertrand.tombal@saintluc.uclouvain.be.
Beate WieselerDepartment Drug Assessment, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: beate.wieseler@iqwig.de.
Michael ZaiacDaiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: Michael.Zaiac@daiichi-sankyo.ch.
Caroline Voltz-GiroltEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: caroline.voltz@ema.europa.eu.
Francesco PignattiEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: francesco.pignatti@ema.europe.eu.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicines are often tested in highly controlled environments during clinical trials aimed at rapid development and thorough assessment of their benefits and risks, with key efficacy and safety aspects evaluated for regulatory approval. However, important questions regarding the optimisation of medicines' use in clinical practice may remain unanswered at the time of marketing authorisation, notably those related to the optimal dose, duration, schedule, sequence, and combination of treatments. This knowledge gap is particularly critical in oncology, where patient quality of life must be prioritised, and there is the pressing need to understand the most efficient use of costly innovative therapies in the context of rising cancer incidence and prevalence. Addressing these challenges requires multi-stakeholder collaboration. Organisations within the Cancer Medicines Forum (CMF), co-chaired by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the European Medicines Agency, have advocated for policy actions promoting treatment optimisation research within the European Union. To advance this objective, the CMF convened a multidisciplinary stakeholder workshop, offering a platform for collaborative dialogue by bringing together experts from governmental bodies, regulatory agencies, health technology assessment bodies, patient organisations, academia, learned societies, industry, public health organisations, clinicians, and investigators. This workshop aimed to examine existing barriers and explore strategies to integrate treatment optimisation into the current cancer clinical research framework, ultimately providing key recommendations, summarised in this review, to systematically embed treatment optimisation in oncology research.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsEuropean UnionHumansQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsCancer clinical researchCancer Medicines ForumHealth policyPatient centricityTreatment optimisation

Identifiers

PMID41512959
PMCPMC12979005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.